A few changes since last time, and a status update.
- Chris Drake is still looking into Kath's times
- Frank has a copy of draft #5 which he will analyse and compare to any results he has on record
- Graham Walsh takes the M50 records by storm
This begs a question...
At the moment we have a number of records which are "pending verification". What I mean by that is that, I have not been able to find an on-line result, or seen a paper copy of the official results. Graham's records are a case in point, as most of them are from his personal archive. However, I have no reason to doubt that they are correct. How should we handle these? Do we just accept them (some are a bit more vague than Graham's)? Or do we require hard-evidence? Perhaps we can accept them if they are "seconded" by another Spen athlete/official?
Thoughts everyone?
Road Records Draft #6
At the moment we have a number of records which are "pending verification". What I mean by that is that, I have not been able to find an on-line result, or seen a paper copy of the official results. Graham's records are a case in point, as most of them are from his personal archive. However, I have no reason to doubt that they are correct. How should we handle these? Do we just accept them (some are a bit more vague than Graham's)? Or do we require hard-evidence? Perhaps we can accept them if they are "seconded" by another Spen athlete/official?
Thoughts everyone?
Road Records Draft #6
Posts
2 comments:
I think most people will accept that some kind of proof is needed.
I can get you the paper copies from the results I have submitted.
I Still have some more to go through - will let you know shortly.
Regards.
Antony Bradford.
I'd support the view that we need to see hard evidence then there's no area for disputes.
But hold on - come to think of it, Ryan has just remembered me clocking 13:58 for 5K at that obscure race in North Yorks earlier this year. Can this be included??
Post a Comment